Identification of barley accessions from the VIR collection carrying the mlo11(cnv2) powdery mildew resistance allele

Background. The search for barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes that carry effective genes for resistance to powdery mildew agent Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei is a present-day issue for Russian plant breeding. The mlo11 allele that confers long-term protection of barley against the pathogen is rarely found among the varieties, approved for cultivation in the territory of Russia. There is no information on the occurrence among Russian varieties of another effective allele, mlo11 (cnv2), therefore, the search for its source is a current necessity. Materials and methods. Seven barley accessions from Ethiopia and 7 accessions from Japan have been tested for resistance to the northwestern population of the powdery mildew agent in the field and in laboratory conditions. To identify of the Mlo gene alleles, nucleotide sequences of the Stowaway-MITE (Miniature Inverted-repeat Transposable Elements) and the adjacent promoter fragments were determined. Results. Phytopathological tests in the field and greenhouse conditions, as well as molecular markers were used to study 14 barley accessions from Ethiopia and Japan. According to the preliminary tests, plants were resistant to powdery mildew. The highly effective allele of powdery mildew resistance mlo11 (cnv2) was for the first time identified in four barley accessions from Ethiopia, k-20087, k-20523, k-20524 and k-28126. Under field conditions, adult plants were resistant, and in the greenhouse they were moderately damaged by powdery mildew (1-2 points). The disease symptoms were similar to those described for the sample Eth295, a carrier of the mlo11(cnv2) allele variant: single pustules and the absence of necrotic spots on the leaves. The fragments of Stowaway-MITE and adjacent Mlo 5' promoter sequences were amplified in all 14 accessions. The amplicons were cloned and sequenced. The unique marker SNPs within the MITE and Mlo 5’ promoter sequences, i.e. the substitutions of cytosine by thymine in positions 262 and 452, were found only in k-20087, k-20523, k-20524 and k-28126. These accessions belong to different botanical varieties and differ from each other in a number of morphological features, i.e. they are not duplicates. Conclusions. The genotypes selected as a result of the study can serve as a source of the mlo11(cnv2) allele in breeding powdery mildew-resistant barley varieties.

1. Abdullaev R.A., Lebedeva T.V., Alpatyeva N.V., Yakovleva O.V., Kovaleva O.V, Radchenko E.E., Anisimova I.N., Batasheva B.A., Karabitsina Yu.I., Kuznetsova E.B. Genetic diversity of barley accessions from Ethiopia for powdery mildew resistance. Russian Agricultural Sciences. 2019;45(3):232-235. DOI: 10.3103/S1068367419030029

2. Abdullaev R.A., Batasheva B.A., Alpatieva N.V., Chumakov M.A., Radchenko E.E., Kovaleva O.N., Yakovleva O.V. Resistance of barley cultivars approved for use in Russia to harmful organisms and toxic aluminum ions. Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding. 2020;181(3):120-127. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.30901/2227-8834-2020-3-120-127

3. Alpatieva N.V., Antonova O.Yu., Radchenko E.E., Abdullaev R.A., Karabitsina Y.I., Anisimova I.N. PCR diagnostics for harmful organisms of guar: (guidelines). E.K. Potokina (ed.). St. Petersburg: VIR; 2019. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.30901/978-5-907145-44-3

4. Anisimova I.N., Alpatyeva N.V., Abdullaev R.A., Karabitsina Y.I., Kuznetsova E.B. Screening of plant genetic resources with the use of DNA markers: basic principles, DNA isolation, PCR setup, agarose gel electrophoresis: (guidelines). E. E. Radchenko (ed.). St. Petersburg: VIR; 2018. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.30901/978-5-905954-81-8

5. Dawson I.K., Russell J., Powell W., Steffenson B., Thomas W.T.B., Waugh R. Barley: a translational model for adaptation to climate change. New Phytologist. 2015;206:913-931. DOI: 10.1111/nph.13266

6. Dreiseitl A. Genes for resistance to powdery mildew in European barley cultivars registered in the Czech Republic from 2011 to 2015. Plant Breeding. 2017;136(3):351-356. DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12471

7. Ge X., Deng W., Lee Z.Z., Lopez-Ruiz F.J., Schweizer P., Ellwood S.R. Tempered mlo broad-spectrum resistance to barley powdery mildew in an Ethiopian landrace. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):29558. DOI: 10.1038/srep29558

8. Ge C., Moolhuijzen P., Hickey L., Wentzel E., Deng W., Dinglasan E.G., Ellwood S.R. Physiological changes in barley mlo-11 powdery mildew resistance conditioned by tandem repeat copy number. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(22):8769. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228769

9. Gong X., Li C., Zhang G., Yan G., Lance R., Sun D. Novel Genes from Wild Barley Hordeum spontaneum for Barley Improvement. In: G. Zhang, C. Li, X. Liu (eds). Advance in Barley Sciences. Springer: Dordrecht; 2013. p.69-89. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4682-4_6

10. Jørgensen J.H., Wolfe M. Genetics of powdery mildew resistance in barley. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 1994;13(1):97-119. DOI: 10.1080/07352689409701910

11. Kusch S., Panstruga R. mlo-based resistance: An apparently universal "weapon" to defeat powdery mildew disease. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2017;30:179-189. DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-12-16-0255-CR

12. Loskutov I.G., Kovaleva O.N., Blinova E.V. Methodological guidelines for studying and maintaining the global collection of barley and oat (Metodicheskiye ukazaniya po izucheniyu i sokhraneniyu mirovoy kollektsii yachmenya i ovsa). St. Petersburg: VIR; 2012. [in Russian].

13. Mains E.B., Dietz S.M. Physiologic forms of barley mildew Erysiphe graminis DC. Phytopathology. 1930;20(3):229-239.

14. Piffanelli P., Ramsay L., Waugh R., Benabdelmouna A., D’Hont A., Hollricher K., Jorgensen J.H., Schulze-Lefert P., Panstruga R. A barley cultivation-associated polymorphism conveys resistance to powdery mildew. Nature. 2004;430(7002):887-891. DOI: 10.1038/nature02781

15. Radchenko E.E., Zvejnek I.A., Tyryshkin L.G., Konovalova G.S., Semenova A.G., Hohlova A.P. Catalogue of the VIR global collection. Issue 751. Pest and disease resistance of accessions from South-East Asia (Katalog mirovoy kollektsii VIR. Vypusk 751. Ustoychivost obraztsov iz Yugo-Vostochnoy Azii k vreditelyam i boleznyam). St. Petersburg: VIR; 2004. [in Russian].

16. Reinstädler A., Müller J., Jerzy H., Czembor J.H., Piffanelli P., Panstruga R. Novel induced mlo mutant alleles in combination with site-directed mutagenesis reveal functionally important domains in the heptahelical barley Mlo protein. BMC Plant Biology. 2010;10(1):31. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-31

17. Seeholzer S. Isolation and characterization of new R-protein variants encoded at the barley Mla locus that specify resistance against the fungus powdery mildew. University of Zurich, Faculty of Science; 2009. DOI: 10.5167/uzh-31283

18. Surin N.A., Zobova N.V., Lyakhova N.E., Neshumaeva N.A., Plechanova L.W., Onuphrienok T.V., Chuslin A.A., Gerasimov S.A., Lipshin A.G. Sources of valuable features in breeding of barley for adaptability. Research and Technical Advances of Agribusiness Sector. 2016;30(6):36-40. [in Russian].

19. Takahashi R. The origin and evolution of cultivated barley. Advances in Genetics. 1955;7(3):227-266. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60097-8

20. Tratwal A., Bocianowski J. Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei virulence frequency and the powdery mildew incidence on spring barley in the Wielkopolska province. Journal of Plant Protection Research. 2014;54(1):28-35. DOI: 10.2478/jppr-2014-0005

21. Vavilov N.I. Origin and geography of cultivated plants (Proiskhozhdenie i geografiya kulturnyh rastenij). V.F. Dorofeev (ed.). Leningrad: Nauka; 1987. [in Russian].