Variability of morphological and phenological traits in Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. accessions contrasting by growth type in different ecological and geographical conditions

Background. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) is a thermophilic crop that occupies the third place in the world in terms of cultivation area among leguminous crops. Vegetable cowpea cultivars are successfully cultivated in the open ground in Russia, in its southern regions and the south of the Far East. The creation of new cultivars adapted to cultivation in different regions and suitable for widespread industrial production, is extremely relevant. Materials and methods. The variability of 20 morphological and three phenological traits of six cowpea accessions with different growth habit types and architectonics was assessed in various ecological and geographical conditions at VIR experiment stations (in Astrakhan Province, Primorye Territory and Krasnodar Territory) in 2019-2022. The variability and interrelationships of the traits were estimated using basic and multivariate statistical methods. Results. The analysis revealed a significant influence of the factor complex (genotype/accession, research location) on the variability of traits. Phenological traits, the length of internodes and leaflets depended most strongly on the research location. The range of variation in the number of nodes, branches, peduncles and pods per plant, stem thickness and pod size were determined by the genotype to a larger extent. The range of stem length variability was significantly influenced by the research location and the genotype, though the genotype had a stronger influence. The genotypes responded differently to changes in growing conditions. For most of the studied accessions, an increase in the main stem length was noted in the monsoon climate conditions of the Primorye Territory, for some of them the type of growth habit changed from determinant to indeterminate. In our research, the plant length was positively correlated with the amount of precipitation and with the average relative humidity. Excessive humidity and precipitation had minimal effect only on the cultivar ‘Lyanchihe’, whose plants retained dwarfness and compact architectonics. Factor analysis (principal factors analysis) revealed four factors responsible for the main part of the variance of the analyzed traits. The characteristics of the leaf were combined in the first factor, those of architectonics and time of plant development in the second, traits of the seedling and the juvenile stage in the third, and those of the pod in the fourth factor. These complexes of traits (factors) determined the variability of cowpea in our research. Conclusion. The performed analysis of morphological and phenological traits revealed a significant increase of stem length and changes in plant architectonics under conditions of high relative humidity and a large amount of precipitation. In some cases, even the type of growth habit was changed. The further research on the studied characters variability involving more accessions and the determination of molecular mechanisms that control stability of the growth habit type and length of the stem will allow us to proceed to a more efficient and rapid creation of new cultivars suitable for mechanized cultivation. This is extremely important for the development of new areas by cultivating species, the demand in which as a source of food and feed is increasing in the Russian Federation.

1. Burlyaeva M.O., Gurkina M.V., Chebukin P.A Screening of long-podded cowpea (Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalis (L.) Verdc.) samples from VIR collection for resistance to biotic and abiotic stressors. Selektsiya i semenovodstvo ovochnich kultur. 2014;45:131-141. [In Russian]

2. Burlyaeva M.O., Gurkina M.V., Chebukin P.A. Studies of long-podded cowpea from VIR collection and the prospects of its cultivation in Russia. Zemledelie = Crop Farming. 2015;1:45-48.

3. Burlyaeva M.O., Gurkina M.V., Chebukin P.A., Kiseleva N.A. International descriptors for species of the genus Vigna Savi (Mezhdunarodny klassifikator vidov roda Vigna Savi). St. Petersburg: VIR; 2016. [in Russian]

4. Burlyaeva M.O., Gurkina M.V., Miroshnichenko E.V. Application of multivariate analysis to identify relationships among useful agronomic characters of cowpea and differentiation of cultivars for vegetable and grain uses. Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding. 2021;182(4):36-47. [In Russian]. DOI: 10.30901/2227-8834-2021-4-36-47

5. Chebukin P.А., Burlyaeva М.О. Comparatively study of varieties of vegetable cowpea of different breeding periods in Primoriye region. Vegetable crops of Russia. 2016;4(33):36-45. [In Russian]

6. Chia S.Y., Lim M.W. A critical review on the influence of humidity for plant growth forecasting. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2022;1257:012001. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1257/1/012001

7. Dow El-Madina I.M., Hall A.E. Flowering of contrasting cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) genotypes under different temperatures and photoperiods. Field Crops Research. 1986;14:87-104. DOI: 10.1016/0378-4290(86)90049-3

8. Fanourakis D., Aliniaeifard S., Sellin A., Giday H., Körner O.; Nejad A.R., Delis C., Bouranis D., Koubouris G., Kam-Bourakis E., Nikoloudakis N., Tsaniklidis G. Stomatal behavior following mid- or long-term exposure to high relative air humidity: A review. Plant Physiology et Biochemistry 2020;153:92-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.05.024

9. Fortunatova O.K. The dependence of plant height on geographical factors of growth. Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding. 1928;19(1):385-466. [In Russian]

10. Gerrano A.S., Adebola P.O., Jansen van Rensburg W.S., Laurie S.M. Genetic variability in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) genotypes. South African Journal of Plant and Soil. 2015;32(3):165-174. DOI: 10.1080/02571862.2015.1014435

11. Gurkina M.V. Evaluation of the collection samples of the sparge tire as an initial material for selection in the Astrakhan region. Vestnik of Prikaspia. 2018;3(22):27-32. [In Russian]

12. Gurkina M.V. Variability and correlations of economically valuable traits in cowpea from the VIR collection in the environments of Astrakhan provincer. Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding. 2019;180(1):59-65. [In Russian]. DOI: 10.30901/2227-8834-2019-1-59-65

13. Huxley P.A., Summerfield R.J. Effects of daylength and day/night temperatures on growth and seed yield of cowpea cv. K 2809 grown in controlled environments Annals of Applied Biology. 1976;83(2):259-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1976.tb00605.x

14. Huxley P.A., Summerfield R.J., Hughes A.P. Growth and development of soy-abean cv. TK5 as affected by tropical daylengths, daylnight temperatures and nitrogen nutrition. Annals of Applied Biology. 1976;82(1):117-133. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1976.tb01679.x

15. Inouye J., Shanmugasundaram S., Masuyama T. Effects of temperature and daylength soybean on the flowering some photo-insensitive varieties. Japanese journal of tropical agriculture. 1979;22(4):167-171. DOI:10.11248/JSTA1957.22.167

16. Ivanter E.V., Korosov A.V. Introduction to quantitative biology (Vvedeniye v kolichestvennuyu biologiyu). Petrozavodsk: PetrGU; 2011 [In Russian]

17. Kondykov I.V., Zotikov V.I., Zelenov A.N., Kondykova N.N., Uvarov V.N. Biology and selection of determinant form of pea. Orel: Kartush; 2006 [In Russian]

18. Krylova E.A, Khlestkina E.K, Burlyaeva M.O. Influence of air humidity on variability of morphological features of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. in artificial conditions. Ecological genetics. 2022;20(3):215-229. [In Russian]. DOI: 10.17816/ecogen108877

19. Li X., Zhang P., Liu J., Wang H., Liu J., Li H., Xie H., Wang Q., Li L., Zhang S., Huang L., Liu L., Qin P. Integrated Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analysis of the Quinoa Seedling Response to High Relative Humidity Stress. Biomolecules. 2023;3:1352. DOI: 10.3390/biom13091352

20. Luzina Z.A. About the geographical variability of biological and economic characteristics of lentils. Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding. 1962;34(1):164-175. [In Russian]

21. Methodology for state crop variety trials. First issue. General provisions (Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya selskokhozyaystvennykh kultur. Vypusk pervy. Obshchaya chast). Moscow: Gossortkomissiya; 2019. [in Russian]. URL: https://gossortrf.ru/upload/2019/08/metodica_1.pdf [дата обращения: 25.07.2023].

22. Mortensen L.M. Effects of air humidity on growth, flowering, keeping quality and water relations of four short-day green-house species. Scientia Horticulturae. 2000;86(4):299-310. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00155-2

23. O’Leary J.W., Knecht G.N. The Effect of relative humidity on growth, yield, and water consumption of bean plants. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 1971;96(3):263-265. DOI: 10.21273/JASHS.96.3.263

24. Shmidt V.M. Mathematical methods in botany (Matematicheskiye metody v botanike). Leningrad: Publishing house of Leningrad State University; 1984. [in Russian]

25. Specialized datasets for climate research. RIHMI-WDC: [website] [in Russian]. URL: http://aisori-m.meteo.ru/waisori/index0.xhtml [дата обращения: 30.01.2024].

26. Stoilova T., Pereira G. Assessment of the genetic diversity in a germplasm col-lection of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) using morphological traits. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2013;82:208-215. DOI:10.5897/AJAR12.1633

27. Summerfield R.J., Minchin F.R., Stewart K.A., Ndunguru B.J. Growth, reproductive de-velopment and yield of effectively nodulated cowpea plants in contrasting aerial environments. Annals of Applied Biology. 1978;90:277-291. DOI:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1978.tb02636.x

28. Summerfield R.J., Wien H.C. Effects of photoperiod and air temperature on growth and yield of economic legumes. In: R.J. Summerfield, A.H. Bunting (eds). Advances in legumes science. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 1980. p.17-36.

29. Talbot M. Yield variability of crop varieties in the U.K. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 1984;102(2):315-321. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859600042635

30. Vavilov N.I. Geographical variability of plants. Nauchnoe slovo. 1928;1:23-33. [in Russian]

31. Vishnyakova M.A., Seferova I.V., Buravtseva T.V., Burlyaeva M.O., Semenova E.V., Filipenko G.I., Aleksandrova T.G., Egorova G.P., Yankov I.I., Bulyntsev S.V., Gerasimova T.V., Drugova E.V. VIR Global Collection of Grain Legume Crop Genetic Resources: Replenishment, Conservation and Studying : Methodological Guidelines. M.A. Vishnyakova (ed.). 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: VIR, 2018. [in Russian]

32. Weather and climate: reference and information portal (Pogoda i klimat: cpravochno-informatsionnyy portal). 2024. [in Russian]. URL: http://www.pogodaiklimat.ru/ [дата обращения: 20.01.2024].

33. Wien H.C., Summerfield R.J. Adaptation of cowpeas in West Africa: effects of photoperiod and temperature responses in cultivars of diverse origin. In: R.J. Summerfield, A.H. Bunting (eds). Advances in legumes science. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 1980. p.405-417.

34. Zhuchenko A.A. Adaptive Potential of Cultivated Plants (genetic and ecological bases). Chisinau: Štiinca, 1988. [In Russian]